SCNET · Enterprise IT · Ankara, Türkiye

Sanal Çekirdek

Keep critical transactions available, data controlled and AI auditable.

Financial services technology combines speed, trust, and evidence in the same architecture: a small delay in a transaction chain affects customer experience, while a weak identity or data control creates a much wider risk. Sanal Çekirdek designs that architecture around transaction integrity and regulatory expectations together.

Critical transaction and channel resilience

Payment, account, lending, treasury, contact-center and digital-channel flows are mapped with service dependencies. RTO/RPO, data consistency and phased restoration are based on business impact.

  • End-to-end transaction observability
  • Primary/secondary architecture and DRaaS
  • Cyber recovery and trusted restoration
  • Peak-period capacity

Identity, fraud and cyber risk

Customer and workforce identity, behavioral signals, transaction context and threat data are connected in a shared risk view. Automated blocking and review decisions include explainability and human escalation.

  • Strong identity and transaction verification
  • Fraud analytics and case workflows
  • Privileged access and separation of duties
  • SOC, incident response and evidence

Data sovereignty and governed AI

We make it clear where customer, transaction and risk data resides and who can use it for what purpose. RAG and AI agents operate within the organization's control boundary with permission filtering, logging, evaluation and human approval.

  • Private cloud and segregated data domains
  • Permission-aware knowledge retrieval
  • Model risk and performance evaluation
  • AI action logs and approval gates

Auditable integration and change

Across open banking, payment networks, third-party services and core systems, we manage schemas, transactions, errors, identity and versions together. Changes are performed with evidence and rollback plans.

  • API security and rate controls
  • Transaction integrity and reconciliation
  • Third-party risk and access
  • Release, test and change evidence

How we work

  1. Map critical transaction flows and regulatory expectations together
  2. Rank outage and fraud scenarios by business impact
  3. Design the active/secondary architecture and authorization model
  4. Run a measured pilot on a single channel
  5. Extend to other channels alongside the audit evidence

How success is measured

  • Transaction success, latency and reconciliation variance
  • Critical-service availability and recovery testing
  • Fraud-detection quality and false positives
  • Access, change and AI-decision evidence

Frequently asked questions

Can public cloud be used for financial data?

There is no universal answer without assessing the workload, data class, region, terms, key ownership and access model. Suitable workloads may use a hybrid architecture, with decisions made alongside legal, risk and compliance teams.

Can AI make lending or risk decisions by itself?

High-impact decisions require specific assessment of regulation, explainability, discrimination risk, data quality and appeal mechanisms. AI is often better positioned as decision support and prioritization.

What matters most in open-banking integration?

Beyond identity and consent, the design must cover transaction integrity, failure behavior, retries, rate limits, observability, certificate lifecycle and third-party ownership.

Clarify critical financial flows, data controls and AI boundaries together.

Request a financial architecture assessment