SCNET · Enterprise IT · Ankara, Türkiye

Sanal Çekirdek

The knowledge exists; the problem is how long it takes to reach it.

In most organizations the answer is already written in a document. The loss is the time spent finding that document and reading the right part of it. This page is about shortening that time and measuring the gain.

The architecture — retrieval, permission inheritance and citation — is covered on the Enterprise RAG page. Here we discuss which scenario gains how much.

Scenario selection and baseline

The gain depends on the scenario chosen. A support team's response preparation time, a new joiner's ramp-up and a field team's procedure lookup are measured differently, and each gets its own baseline.

  • How many people, how many times, is answered per scenario
  • Today's average time to find is measured
  • Questions that go unanswered today are counted too
  • A gain target is written per scenario

Content readiness and ownership

Outdated, contradictory and ownerless documents return poor results even from a good retrieval system. Content past its shelf life is excluded when the source set is chosen, and every document set gets an owner.

  • Contradicting documents are identified and sent to their owner
  • Content past its shelf life is left out of scope
  • The document owner takes on responsibility for updates
  • Scope starts narrow and widens on evidence

Trust and verification

A user who cannot see where an answer came from tries the system once and abandons it. Every answer shows its source, and where no source is found the system says so rather than guessing.

  • Answers arrive with the document and section they rest on
  • No source means no answer
  • Users can flag an answer as wrong
  • Flagged answers are routed to the document owner

Adoption and gain

The gain appears when the system is used, not when it is built. Usage, answer accuracy and time to find are tracked together; where adoption is low, the problem is usually content quality.

  • Usage is measured per scenario and per team
  • Time to find is compared against the baseline
  • Unanswered questions reveal content gaps
  • Content gaps are routed to document owners

How we work

  1. Choose the scenario and measure its baseline
  2. Curate the source set and assign owners
  3. Run a pilot in narrow scope
  4. Enable citations and feedback
  5. Verify the gain on the same measure, then widen

How success is measured

  • Time to reach information is shorter than the baseline
  • Every answer cites a source
  • Fewer questions come back without an answer
  • Content gaps reach their owners

Frequently asked questions

What does the Enterprise RAG page cover instead?

Architecture lives there: retrieval, permission inheritance, citation and evaluation. This one covers which business scenario gains how much, and how that gain is measured.

Our documents are scattered — can this still work?

Yes, if you start narrow. Rather than bringing the whole archive into scope, begin with the document set one scenario needs; widen once the gain is visible.

What happens when it answers wrongly?

The user flags the answer, the flag reaches the document owner and the source is corrected. That loop cannot exist without citation, which is why sources are mandatory.

Tell us which team is looking for which information; we will measure today's time to find and set the target together.

Let's measure time to find