What decides placement
Not every workload belongs in the same place. Latency sensitivity, data class and legal location requirements, how the licensing model treats virtualization and core counts, integration dependencies and exit cost are weighted in one table. The decision follows criteria, not preference.
- Latency, throughput and predictability requirements
- Data class, location and access constraints
- Licensing model: core, socket and virtualization effects
- Dependencies and cost of exit
When colocation is the right answer
Hardware still under depreciation, workloads that need dedicated accelerators, cases where data location is fixed by contract, and steady loads whose unit economics are unpredictable in public cloud all favor colocation. The same reasoning does not hold for variable or seasonal demand.
- Existing hardware still under depreciation
- Dedicated hardware and accelerator requirements
- Data location fixed by contract
- Steady, predictable load profile
Hardware and software sourcing
Sourcing follows the architecture decision, never precedes it. The requirement list is derived from the target architecture, the licensing model is matched to actual usage, and warranty and support scope is chosen against workload criticality. We work vendor-neutral and document why each choice was made.
- Requirement list derived from target architecture
- Licensing model matched to actual usage
- Warranty and support scope set by criticality
- Lifecycle and refresh schedule defined up front
Migration and operational handover
A migration is a project with acceptance criteria, not an overnight task. Inventory and dependency mapping come first, rack and cabling plans follow, and the migration window is reconciled with the business calendar. Handover completes when the acceptance criteria are met.
- Inventory and dependency map
- Rack, power and cabling plan
- Migration window and rollback plan
- Acceptance criteria and operational handover